Not until the final five minutes does the eponymous hardware enthusiast acquire his signature weapon before that, we are treated to 80 minutes of miserable, though markedly chainsaw-free, bloodletting that seems more indebted to the worst instincts of one Mr. It's hard to imagine any fan of Texas Chainsaw, or anyone that thought they were going to get a chainsaw-adjacent flick, being satisfied with this. Ten years later, now living as Jackson, the young man finds himself on the run after escaping the institution along with a gang of psychotic inmates who execute a killing spree on their journey home.Ībsolutely exhausting, boring drivel. I think it's up to you to decide when and how the events of the other movies happen.As a child, Jedidiah Sawyer (Sam Strike) was taken from his murderous family and placed in a home for wayward children, where he was renamed to further distance himself from his troubled past. I love a lot of things about that movie – it's so wacky and of its time," he explained. "When movies do that, sometimes it feels a bit disrespectful to all the other films. If we get future movies in this timeline (and nothing has been confirmed yet), it could be expanded to include previous sequels as producer and co-writer Fede Álvarez told EW that he has no intention of skipping what's come before. She didn't "sink into catatonia" or die in 1977, but has actually spent almost 50 years itching for a Leatherface rematch. While the new movie doesn't completely ignore the sequels in the original timeline, it does retcon what they had told us about Sally. However, the big change here is that it's a legacy sequel that brings back Sally Hardesty, with Olwen Fouéré taking over the role from Marilyn Burns who passed away in 2014. It won't surprise you to know that we've got another direct sequel on our hands with Texas Chainsaw Massacre. Reboots just weren't a major thing yet, so if Leatherface was going to come back, the only approach was to keep calm and carry on, ignoring little things like whether or not he was killed off in the previous movie (like at the end of the sequel).Īs we mentioned though, if you really committed to the chronological approach, you'd have to keep going back to the original movie after watching each sequel (which could lead to real-life chainsaw-wielding madness) making it three separate timelines and not one overall timeline.Īnd so we come to the latest attempt to revive the Texas Chainsaw Massacre series for a modern audience. There's little to connect the numerous sequels of Nightmare on Elm Street, for instance, so it's not a major surprise that continuity wasn't really thought about here. However, it changes the surname of Leatherface's family from Sawyer to Slaughter (yes, really), so it's questionable if it even acts as a direct sequel to the first movie anyway.ĭespite the inconsistencies, you can still view these four movies as one timeline given that it's just what horror franchises originally did. The fourth movie mentions "two minor, yet apparently related incidents" that happened after 1973, so it appears as though it sits within the same continuity as the previous two movies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |